Human Nature

You are currently browsing the archive for the Human Nature category.

Modern economics are a gargantuan complex of numbers and psychologies, national moods and dealers of clairvoyance, making any general study of economics an almost forbidden affair.  In cahoots with the philosophy of Bad Natured, only economists tend to paint a veritable picture of human nature.  Unfortunately that picture is hung in the back alleys of capitalism, hidden from the general public for fear that its disclosure might create a social upheaval in the bloated system of corporate politics.  We here at Bad Natured are not so inclined towards reticence and discretion.

As abstruse as our economic infrastructure has come to be, there is one simple aspect that deserves cool deliberation.  Our economic system is unwaveringly dependent upon unlimited growth.  In other words, were our current system to stabilize itself in a zero-growth fashion, it would falter.  OR, when the resources that our economic system demands be infinite instead reveal their finite nature, economic collapse will result.  By account of our current system, it is as if man has based our economic system on the utilization of the resources of the entire universe but in fact is limited to those remaining resources that our planet has to offer.  Unless we succumb to fairy tale logic, when the ignored limitations of the Earth’s resources come front and center as a real-time phenomenon, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.

Now we at Bad Natured are all for branching out into the universe, looking for planets chock full of iron and water and maybe even energy, but man had better get his ducks all in order and foment such  a search instead of persisting in the bitter and mindless squabble over the dwindling Earth-bound resources at hand.  Better yet, maybe another planet will occasion an atmosphere conducive to human colonization.  With all of our current technology seemingly directed towards enhancing our silly need for hand held devices of music, connectivity, and personal branding,  maybe we should invest in a sidereal campaign and concentrate our efforts towards fomenting such an atmosphere on some presently uninhabitable planet.  Unless man can suddenly champion an economic system not based on a fantastical notion of infinite creation of products to satisfy an equally infinite demand for consumption, a materialism driven by the discontent found in a self-aware creature that has traded in his sense of community for a finite moment of greed contented, man had better light a match under the butts of NASA’s ace scientists such that we will have a home to export our Juggernauts of posterity, the ceaseless consumers of the morrow.

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

The Middle Ages, when feudalism predominated the social structure, may have also marked the heights of humanity, at least from the perspective of human nature.  With Europe dotted with miniature kingdoms, with lord, knight, and vassals enclosed by the medieval stone walls, what better expression of humanity can be found that could rival this great era through its adherence to the realities of human nature?

Flouting the fantastical notions of egalitarianism, the hierarchical nature of man was supported with aplomb, letting man’s natural order of things to come to fruition in the old fashion habit of letting man earn his way to the top through capacity, aggression, and inherent dominance.  In doing so, humans came to exist in a fashion that accorded full support of his natural behavioral inclinations.  This is not to say that life was easy and without strife, but that the source of man’s discontent was real and not merely contrived.  Man’s struggles were real, for life is a struggle, which is the natural order of biological inevitability.  In the first world man, this notion no longer exists in the masses, where the instinctual basics of life are all too accessible, and to make up for this lack of a genuine struggle, humans, in order to create an atmosphere that feels genuine, strives to creates strife and struggle out of thin air, with the drama queen rightfully sitting on the throne in this court of the easy life.

The Rule of 150, with the Rule of Familiarity as its shadow, are shown their full respect in the feudal kingdom.  These rules, coupled with man’s capacity for empathy, kept untoward strife and mischief down to an acceptable minimum, and men are much less inclined to profit through disreputable shenanigans levied against those within their community.   The small micro-sphere allotted for reasonable numbers of humans to be housed together in a fashion such that facial recognition of its members was near if not ubiquitous.  In doing so, xenophobia and other expression of human nature were obviated by the Rule of Familiarity, at least within the bounds of the moat’s interior circumference.  Man’s natural inclinations towards apotheosis also found repose in the feudal kingdom, culminating in the divine respect to the lord of the land.  As well, the natural fears of shame, humiliation, and fear of banishment likely kept the locals from misguided endeavors that would threaten the overall harmony of the whole.

Surely there was war between the kingdoms, but their wars were limited to knights or samurais avenging some slight or other insult and were not the atrocious wars seen today, where material pursuits and genocide seem to be the dominant intrigues of martial endeavors.

As such, the feudal community had all of the requisite elements for a group of humans to exist in relative harmony compete with an inherent and natural behavioral police force to keep its inhabitant for disturbing the peace beyond acceptable means.  Opposed to the ubiquitous strife, discontent, loneliness, and suffering that today’s modern world has to offer its civilians and citizens, the feudal community might just have been the height of humanity, and unless men come to view themselves in an honest light as to their veritable animal nature, it seems unlikely that humanity will ever come to surmount the social acme of feudalism.

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , ,

First off, let’s begin with a clear definition.  To inculcate is to impress upon the mind of one or many by frequent instruction or repetition; to instill.  In other words, inculcation is brainwashing, a lovely term that is all too illuminating.  Cultural inculcation is that ever present hum of civilization that incessantly offers hints as to how a man should think and act within the bounds of his homeland.  In essence, it becomes the social, ethnic, or national origin of ought.  Culture itself can be thought of as the social glue that holds the people under its sway together as a united community.  As the globe became swollen with humans, a culture’s function transcended from merely modulating man’s natural inclinations to that of repressing many of these same inclinations when they hindered the propagation of the society under its sway.  It accomplishes this by way of cultural inculcation, cryptically instructing man in the art of appropriate behavior and patterns of thought.

The vehicles of cultural inculcation are many, some being almost obtrusive, others secreted in the fabric of society.  The obvious source of cultural inculcation is found in the media.  From news broadcasts, marketing, to the general programming, we hear and literally visualize how we are to be.  Men themselves become vehicles of cultural inculcation, as this Bad Natured quote solidifies:  “The point here is that we ingest, digest, and ultimately radiate the incessant murmur of acceptable cultural norms as appreciated on our television screens.”

One of the more insidious sources of cultural inculcation comes from our leaders in the form of propaganda.  It is through propaganda that our political and business leaders literally brainwash the masses such that they can exact their political and corporate machinations.  “Every angle must be examined, every lead that tends towards the ultimate conclusion must be ostensibly considered, and, most importantly, repeatedly whispered into the ears of the unsuspecting public, for this notion to finally reach the pinnacle of success, which is to mature into an inculcated belief, veritable dogma in the eyes of the public.”  The shady side of propaganda is found in the phenomenon of calumny, which are false statements that maliciously made to damage another’s reputation.  The paradigm example of calumny might be found around election time in the myriad of slanderous ads whose only intents are to damage the reputations of the opposition.  Not all of propaganda is to be rebuked though.  “…the point is not to disparage propaganda or inculcation as they are necessary tools of society, for we must sometimes generate such concepts in order to get people to go along with policies that might not specifically benefit men on an individual basis but that promise to be good for the health of the entire society.”  More so, cultural inculcation is the means by which a country comes to define itself.  “Americans are instilled with the notion that to challenge any endeavor of our government is anti-American by definition.  The citizens of all countries, it is contended, undergo such a process; it is called patriotism.”

Next on our list of sources of cultural inculcation are the results of our legislative bodies, the law of the land.  Laws are merely inculcated codes of conduct that are deemed necessary to keep order within a society and to allow for over-sized societies to exist and to further expand in a disciplined manner.  As well, the education system serves as the other source of cultural inculcation that is literally reified into existence by way of ink and paper.  “The education system is the perfect place for the state to begin its campaign of inculcation on the young mind.  Even the routine of daily life is inculcated into young minds, with the notion of the nine to five workday becoming the norm in kindergarten or even before.”

One of the most contentious sources of cultural inculcation is infused into humanity by way of its predominating spiritual beliefs.  The differences found in the cultures of Muslims and Christians are the result of inculcation of their respective religious doctrines.  The puissance of spiritual inculcation has reverberated across the globe since god knows when in the form of the ineluctable holy wars that incessantly erupt when neighboring peoples cannot get the other to tergiversate their sacrilegious notions of God and worship the one true God, that of the other side.

Cultural inculcation even alters how reality itself is perceived by the members of a society.  “As a culture propagates its ideologies and notions, what it is really doing is reconfiguring the brain’s ability to perceive reality, to see the world, from a social point of view.  This notion of altered perceptions has been readily demonstrated by psychologists through various tests.  In doing so, people will see things differently, in a literal and measurable sense, depending on their cultural beliefs and thus their perceptions.”

As can be seen, cultural inculcation is a requisite and cryptic method by which a bloated society can exist and maybe even flourish.   “It is one of the main contentions of this thesis that culture and civilization use the powers of inculcation as a social leash to constrain human nature such that societies can exist in numbers that would otherwise prove unsustainable.  In fact, one of the main functions of a culture whose population numbers are explosively colossal is to instill man with acceptable codes of conduct such that his society can remain intact if not expansive.”  And while we can speak of cultural inculcation until we are literally blue in the face, what we cannot seem to do is understand that each of us, as individual human beings, have been brainwashed into believing that our notion of reality is but a belief that has been infused into each of us beginning in our toddler years, for it is nigh impossible to convince a fella’ that he has been brainwashed when the whole of his society has been likewise brainwashed.
Genruk

***All quotes were taken from the soon to be published Bad Natured: Why Humans Cannot Behave.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Man has a problem.  The problem threatens the further interests of man.  The further interests of man is the problem.  The solution to this cyclical problem is to contrive a veritable justification.  Problem obscured.

Sound familiar?  The use of rhetorical logic in our orations in delineating the  difficulties that beset humanity is no new phenomena.  In fact, the amazing thing here is that we have existed for such a spell utilizing such tactics to further society at the expense of its members.  The future only posits an advance of such methods in an attempt to prove that the antithesis of the human creature is the truth, the veritable nature of man a folly to be discredited.  In such a travesty of existence, high-minded man becomes increasing skilled at self-delusion; low-minded man becomes so saddled with adversity that he has no time to consider the origin of his situation, almost as if it were part and parcel with the foundations of existence.  Then, mindlessly inexplicable, the whole house of cards comes tumbling down, with men all in consternation as to why such a house could have failed with but the slightest winds of change.

Western civilization’s house of cards is looking towards a windstorm not with serious attempts to bolster its foundations but with designs for continuous exploitation coupled with explanations and exported culpability.  But our house will fall none the less, and again the common man will bear the brunt of the inevitable implosion of social gravity.

With high society too burdened with retaining their purchase of control, with their mindless clutching of material contentedness and fear of vested interests changing hands, is it in the dregs of society that the power for social to be found?  As social revolts have only proven to exchange bad leaders with worse ones, the path of revolution might be found by simply changing one’s lifestyle..  By ending the relentless pursuit of material contentedness, by simplifying life and instead concentrating one’s hours spent with family and community instead of contriving to spend one’s hours in limitless consumption of goods, the common people might actually make a statement that cannot be ignored by the highfalutin crust of society.  Would not that be something?

Sadly, though, the nature of man does not allow for the dealing of such a pleasant hand.  With this unpleasant truth a new social matrix of humanity is the only way out of this discomfiting labyrinth of cyclic discontent to find its off ramp.  Is man ready to engender such a change. or are we still too enmeshed in rampant materialism to see the darkening horizons that our current designs  hold in the deck of our future?

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

Though time is technically a vector, man’s biological movement through time is a one-way ticket of so-called progress.  While we may look back to the past and wish, hope, pray, and dream that access to those wonderfully naive times might somehow be reclaimed, the reality of man dictates that our progress, our discoveries, and even our mindsets will never allow for such a fantastical reversal of humanity.

What is being hinted at here are not the great discoveries of man such as antibiotics, the internal combustion engine, and the internet, but the capacity to satisfy desires through means best left undiscovered, and the capacity to use other men as vehicles for our limitless need for relentless satisfaction of those wickedly delicious whims.  Be it prostitution or drug addiction, profligate opulence or hideous martial power of life over death, once our taste buds for the seedy side of life have been whetted, there can be no amnesia, no convenient campaign to stamp out the memories of our past exploitations, and thusly we are chained to an existence fueled by our memories to exact future possibilities of our own and our enemies exploitations.

When Alfred Nobel invented dynamite and then perfected smokeless gunpowder, the application of his work headed in directions both good and bad.  Canals were built and foreign territories were blasted into submission.  A century and some change later and things haven’t changed much.  We still dream of peace, dreamy pacifists longing for the past until some teensy-weensy slight to national pride catalyzes the pacific masses into hordes of jingoes longing for revenge- revanche!

What’s the point?  La verite’, for it is time to look to future possibilities, future discoveries, with the truth of human nature, our animal nature, front and center such that we can look for the means by which to contain man’s greatest enemy- the dirigible, delusional masses.  We must finally accept the realities our our being, our behavioral nature born of our biological makeup, and then discover the means by which to govern ourselves.  The fairy tale foundations of legislation, where crimes are deemed to be the work of the Devil, where iniquity is only a concept by which to hide our behavioral impetus when large numbers of men become ungovernable, where we pretend that intangible concepts become tangible by mere verbalization, are to be discarded with the rest of the inculcations of man such that our new world order can be founded upon la verite’, the truth.  Only then can we begin the work of extracting the truths of humanity by dissolving the dogmas of culture in our efforts to understand the human creature, an animal driven by animal behavior whose notion of personal reflection is obnubilated by his self-awareness.

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

It is no secret, at least in this mind, that mankind exists in a strange world of self-deception.  Man deceives himself at every level and on every occasion if it serves his barely conscience, if not numb, agenda.  This deception spans from individual acts to the the cyclopean realm of civilization.  The question that must be asked is how much longer can this deception go on.  With atrocities such as wars and genocides being the fruits of such globally instrumented campaigns of self-deception, at what point will the whole charade finally implode?  What will trigger such an implosion?  Will some critical level of prevarication be the agent of destruction, or might men concurrently realize the tragedy of their being in some paroxysmal heave of reality as the appreciation of reality shakes the foundations of human existence, with the infrastructure of society too flimsy to sustain such a quake?  If man is to realize that to move forward as an intelligent, mindful, and socially constructive species, we must first look behind us to discover the truth of man, the deceptive facade of civilization, and thereby look for authentic solutions to deal with the ever problematic fountain of discontent that results from human nature as it comes to blows with the disingenuous inculcation of our cultural?  Lemmings over the cliff or brave individuals unafraid of the mirror, what is to become of the human creature?

Genruk’

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

There are, and will forever be, discussions regarding what one “ought and ought not” to do.  The origins of ought spring from obligation, duty, prudence, and in some cases desirability, predictability, and even empathy.  It is in the arena of obligation, duty, and empathy that this word needs to be frequented in our philosophic endeavors.  When we ought not do something for our benefit at the expense of another, from whence does the authoritarian voice of abstinence come?  Does is arise from the wellspring of the cosmos, or might it be generated from somewhere closer to home?  More importantly, why is it there at all?

Most spiritually inclined individuals will have a ready-made answer in the manifestation of God, for it is God’s will to abide by the rules of ought and to question the whys of God’s will is outrageous blasphemy.  Fair enough for those willing to live by the strict accounts of faith, but most people live by a slide rule of strictness by the accounts of their shenanigans, all depending on who is looking.  They are conspicuously religious and do right by others when their untoward actions can be appreciated in an unfavorable light.  When their actions are shrouded in secrecy, what they ought to do and what they actually do, even under the eyes of their omniscient God, are many times two different beasts.

Cultural inculcation of what one “ought and ought not” to do springs from both church and society.  This origin of ought runs the gamut from laws that directly state what we should and should not do to the haze cultural standards, codes, and manners.  In essence, man is brainwashed to do what he ought to in order to keep in obesience with his society.  For example, the man of the West Ought to work a forty hour work week in order to do his share to keep his society afloat.  To putz around and not do one’s weekly share of forty hours is likely to glean the askew glance of society at large, an unbecoming feeling best left unfelt.

Lastly we have that shenanigan constraining notion of empathy.  Whilst we would like to engage in affairs that would satisfy our every desire, when our actions might appreciably disturb the serenity of those within our social sphere, we become disinclined to fulfill these desires for fear that our empathy might sully our pleasantries.
Of course, many would like to believe that it is our sublime conscience, born of divine origins, that is the source of disinclination when our desires are for less than religious designs.  The contention here is that while this is a comforting notion indeed, empathy and culture are more than likely the origin for our discomfort, leaving divinity out of the picture in the theatre of “ought.”

The cold reality is that the question of ought is born of man’s social nature, leaving the cosmic ought to wither alone in the cosmos.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

Man must finally come to terms with his world if we want to press forward as a species. Otherwise we will continue to blunder forward like sheep towards a cliff.  It is old news that most of man’s problems lie in the world’s bloated population.  What is not so archaic is how man’s world has become so thick with other men.  The short answer is found in our culture.  One function of a culture is to create cultural norms to be adhered to.  By conforming to the behavioral and visual standards of the day, culture works to make the men of a society appear similar to one another, thereby creating a psychological barrier to keep them from appreciating unfamiliar men as strangers.  In doing this, culture exploits the Rule of Familiarity such that man is less inclined towards violence towards other strangers in his society by creating a facade of familiarity.  The notion of the common ancestor might be the pinnacle of such an endeavor, for this notion allots that all of men of a society share a common ancestor and are thus family, culminating in patriotism followed by jingoism.

The second function of a culture is to curb any and all human behaviors that might in turn curb the propagation of a state, society, or even a civilization.  It accomplishes this on all levels, from state-sanctioned legislation to basic table manners, and everything in between.  Through fear of punishment and humiliation, the function of a culture is to govern all untoward human inclinations that would challenge the greater populations at large.

The problem is that a culture ultimately accomplishes this through repression of man’s basic animal nature, and repressed inclinations do not magically dissolve, but remain under the surface of consciousness, smoldering away until they can finally, and sometimes explosively, be expressed.  The results are discontent at all levels of society and atrocious behaviors expressed in singular if not wholesale sprees of social digressions.  The sprees of violence in our schools and the bouts of genocide that we liken to the Devil’s work are all the culmination of the failures of culturally inspired repression.

What is worse is that those that help to create and govern the ungovernable behaviors of men are themselves saddled above this governing machinery.  Being a human creature, they cannot but help to commit the sins that they are purportedly serving to inhibit.  Those that are caught are labeled as corrupt scoundrels whilst those that deflect detection are celebrated as great leaders.

It is with such knowledge that the world must be appreciated if man is to get over the hump of disgrace that has become his existence today.  In essence, we must move the mountain of dogma whose roots are made of convenience and justification for man’s ways, or we will perish leaving but an ignoble stain on the planet.

Genruk’

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Modern man- what a conundrum!  Living in a post-modern world, modern man is but a savage cloaked in polyester and aftershave.  Humans so want to believe that by altering the perception of the package that the package will in fact change.  By donning a suit and tie, man hopes to simultaneously shed his primitive human nature, the very nature that has led to his current position in life.  Nothing could be that easy.  As modern man first began his transition from hunter-gatherer to sedentary farmer and war-maker some ten thousand years ago, our psychological make-up has made no such transitional commitment.  Furthermore, it may never get the chance do so.

Genetic changes take hundreds of thousands of years to evolve.  But man has only just begun his journey towards a modern existence.  Having been a hunter-gatherer for hundreds of thousands of years, if not a million or more, the primitive make-up of man is cemented in his psyche, precluded the requisite time necessary for any noticeable evolutionary changes to have occurred that will better transform his nature to be compatible with city life.  Furthermore, there is that little thing called culture, whose job is not only repress the shenanigans of the human creature, but to pave the way for the man’s future endeavors, good or bad.  Where it takes biological creatures hundreds of thousands of years to evolve in response to environmental changes, be they meteorological or invasions of non-autochthonous species, cultures evolve in terms of decades if not faster.

The short of it is that men have no chance in the footrace between genetic and cultural evolution.  Men will unfathomably fall short by account of the behavioral inclinations when they are called upon to conform to the standards of the day.  As such, cultures will constantly be hard at work in their efforts to curb man’s natural expression when they are not in accord with the cultural norms of the time or when they do not work to propagate the civilizations under that culture’s sway.  Unfortunately, this repression will be forever be far from perfect. Man’s nastier inclinations will ineluctably leak out in transmissions of atrocious behaviors and endeavors, fuelled by the hunter-gatherer inside and aggravated by the guilt and empathy that are the results of the phenomenon of the self-aware animal that is the human being.  Merci beaucoup.

Genruk’

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Does man believe in God?  A cursory look around at the world suggests that man is spiritual and religious to a T.  But when this notion is approached with an astute eye, the actualities of religious belief falls flat.  If men truly believed in an omnipotent, omniscient god, then how could they possibly treat their fellow men in such an atrocious manner?  While the Rule of Familiarity allows for men to take advantage of the stranger without account of conscience or concern with iniquity, man is all too able to take advantage of people within his community for his sole benefit.  If God sees all, then how do we account for the devious activities of men, especially those that are conspicuous about their religious beliefs?

The answer might be two-fold.  First, it seems all too likely that men really do not believe in God.  If they did, then they would not be so ubiquitously inclined toward the application of their shenanigans against others.  Of course our Catholic friends tried to account for this shortcoming with the confessional, but such an endeavor is more likely a tool to glean more adherents of the Roman Catholic faith for reasons of political strength than an actual belief that God forgives and forgets the sins of man through his confession.  Confession simply reeks of convenience.

On the other hand, man might instead believe in a god that is very close to home.  It is this second account that offers a better answer as to how men could be so rotten to each other.  Through the notion of apotheosis, it is very likely that man has elevated his own self to the heights of divinity, thereby relegating the culpability of his actions to fall through the cracks of his supremacy.  This notion is easily supported through Christianity and, paradoxically, science.  Firstly, that Jesus was a man and the son of God indirectly indicates that all of man are God’s special children, in essence gods on earth.  Secondly, man’s scientific achievements has led to the belief that man has conquered nature, that man has become the supreme creator through his mastery of agriculture, production, and generation of energy.  This in turn hints of a spiritual  dictatorship.  What is ironic here is the the West, born of devout men that were true adherents of the Christian faith, have used the power and tangible results of the mind to replace Jesus with themselves.

By this account, owning to man’s vacuous belief in the God above or to his self-elevated apotheosis, man has no real anxieties as to how his actions might be deemed iniquitous by an outside force, and hence man has no veritable governor as to his actions when they turned towards more nefarious affairs.  Man’s belief in himself leaves no room for a sidereal authority and lots of room for convenient justifications for his exploitative endeavors.  And for what, a world stuffed full of deceit and discontent? 

Can we not do better?  If we are truly the gods that we think we are, is it not time to start acting as such?  More to the point, since we are clearly unable to behave ourselves, since we cannot but utilize our gifts but to add to our swollen coffers, and since we are clearly unable to contain our hateful xenophobia as seen in our campaigns of genocide, might we finally knock ourselves down from our self-elevated throne of divinity and instead look at ways in which we human beings, savvy animals with no self control, can finally come to terms as to what we truly are and thus find designs with which to govern our malign proclivities?  Merci beaucoup.

Genruk’

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »