One significant reason for our paucity of a full examine of human nature is that we wish to keep ourselves distanced from our behavioral similarities to animals which thusly keeps us from appreciating our social and hierarchical nature. Egocentric and intelligent that we are, we are loathe to place ourselves in the same biological category of the common mammal. As much as man hates to admit it, he thinks himself special. In doing so, he both conscioiusly and unconsciously obnubilates those behaviors that he shares with similar animals, and especially so when those similarieites are inconveneisnt and challenge the basic tenets that he prefers to defined by. As such, inclinations exhibited by other social creatures, such as canines and apes, go unexplored, even though these same behaviors could help him come to exact social policies, when based on truth, that will better served society instead of contradicting man and creating discontent. In short, man is hierarchical, opportunistic and exploitative, dominant and aggressive, and unfortunately egocentric. Man is also self-aware and wickedly intelligent, which has allowed us to see ourselves as special and magically above such nasty inclinations of our animal brethren, and our intelligence only serves to help us rationalize and justify our actions in a fashion that keeps us distanced from the behaviors of other social species. In essence, man is truly Bad Natured.
Social Nature
You are currently browsing the archive for the Social Nature category.
The Animal Nature of Man
April 15, 2010 in Discontent, Essays, Human Nature, Philosophy, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
Tags: Discontent, Human Nature, Psychology
Why We Like Bad News
April 12, 2010 in Essays, Human Nature, Philosophy, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
I have noticed a rather unusual disparity between local newscasts and national ones. While the local news is more likely to present stories both good and bad, the national outlets seem to concentrate mostly on the negative things that men do. My question is, can such a disparity support the overall contention of human nature, where men are more likely to cooperate with familiar faces whilst being wary and uncooperative with the nefarious stranger?
Of course it does. While truly local news agencies, which serves a smaller base of viewers, might be more inclined to relate news that is positive, larger news outlets, due to a fan base made up of strangers, tends to concentrate on news items that are negative. This is because a group of strangers, those tuning in to the national news, is more inclined to want to hear negative things regarding strange peoples and are not really concerned with any positive news of the distant stranger. When that same individual turns into his local newscast, he is more than please to see how the scores of the local high school football games, or maybe even a story that exemplifies the goodness of those within his community. This is just further proof that we live unnatural and unfruitful lives by attempting to extend cooperation to people that exist outside of our local community.
Tags: Apostasy, Discontent, Human Nature, Philosophy, Social
Keeping Up with the Jones
April 7, 2010 in Dogma, Essays, Human Nature, Philosophy, Psychology, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
Is there some compelling force with draws us in to keep up with our neighbors? Is it all about pride and ego, or might there be a force of human nature that is in part responsible for such a laughable race to have the best lawn on the block? There is in fact one facet of man’s social nature which can fuel such a phenomenon.
Man’s social nature makes him want to belong, to fit in, and to have social worth within his immediate community. As such, one behavior which can serve as a direct manner to express his social worth is by showing both his similitude and worth by not only having a boat in his driveway, but by having the most expensive boat possible. The boat becomes a symbol that he not only belongs to his community of nautical neighbors, but is also a status symbol of his relative worth in his community. If the social nature of man is exemplified by the desire to be seen in the best possible light, such a symbol becomes a badge that confers both membership and status within the neighbor’s community.
Of course, there is more than a little pride involved here, but that meticulous lawn, Lexus SUV, and sea-worthy status symbol in the driveway can be just the ticket for an invitation to the next neighborhood BBQ, where the neighborhood clan can all revel in their latest exploits. Keeping up with the Jones might be a straight forward expression of man’s social nature after all.
Genruk
Tags: Evolutionary Psychology, Human Nature, Philosophy, Psychology, Social
The Power of the Common Ancestor
April 6, 2010 in Philosophy, Psychology, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
The overall contention of Bad Natured is that men are by nature suspicious if not aggressive to unfamiliar men. In fact, men are by nature xenophobic and this notion has been demonstrated throughout the history of mankind. Only fairy tale logic will prove otherwise. But men are intelligent as well as opportunistic, and as such the benefits that abound from alliance formation between groups have allowed the ever wary stranger to benefit from occasionally befriending the stranger. Does such a notion not negate the overall contention of Bad Natured, that strangers must always remain antagonistic?
At first the notion of alliance formation between potentially competing groups would seem nigh impossible if men are to be viewed as truly xenophobic, but there exists a truly magnificent facet of man that can trick his very nature into allowing such an impossibility to in fact exist. The cohesive forces of family relations are used here as a social glue which can be extended to strangers to make them seem less strange, more trustworthy, and hence less spooky. Such a trick is employed by use of the creation myth that dictates that all of the peoples involved have actually arisen from a common ancestor. Such a myth takes the members of the opposing groups and ties them together through contrived familial relations. Instead of strangers, they are long lost members of the family, and as such the psychological distance created by man’s inherent xenophobia are circumvented, allowing for strangers to embrace their mythologic kin. Even in America, boiling pot of multitudes of differing races, we have the distant notion of the common ancestor tied to our ever divine founding fathers. Of course, such a tactic has its limitations, which have been more than exceeded in this overly populated world of ours, but this notion can at least be seen to be the basis for the hierarchies and alliances that have come to define the ever complicated world of the modern man.
Tags: culture, Human Nature, Philosophy, Psychology, Social
The Triad of Discontent
April 2, 2010 in Discontent, Essays, Human Nature, Philosophy, Psychology, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
Man is at continual odds with his culture, his sense of self, and his innate systems of behaviors. Culture’s function is in part to create standard codes of conduct which creates a social matrix within which he is to function with other humans. Without this matrix, men could not exist within such highly populated societies without engaging in ceaseless violence. His innate inclinations towards violence would constantly pull him into violent altercations with other strange men, for that is his nature. Culture therefore allows for societies to exist in magnitudes that could not occur without policing forces of man’s natural and aggressive behaviors.
Now if men were not so darned self-aware, inclined to introspection, philosophy, and spirituality, to name but a few attributes, his lot would do just fine, for he would not care that his culture and his natural inclinations were at odds with one another. But this is not the case, and instead man is tormented with an inner and an outer sense of self, which becomes combine into essentially a neurotic individual. Man feels some behaviors as naked as the day he was born, but is compelled to believe that these feelings are unnatural and evil. His social nature takes this a step further. Because he wants to be seen in the best light, and because his cohorts all pretend to believe in their inculturations, or rather inculcations, he too pretends to believe that which his society propagates as the correct way to be. Deep down, though, man still feels otherwise, and feels the guilt, cognitive dissonance, and discontent from being at such odds with himself.
Ah, the perpetual plight of man, to never be at ease, pulled in one moment by his natural inclinations, the next minute by his desire to be seen in the most favorable light by those significant to him, only then to be drawn into the facade of how a man should be according to culture, to lastly being sucked into some shenanigan through the power of peer pressure, leaving behind a shell of man whose only repose is chemical relief through endogenous or exogenous addictions such as booze or gambling.
Tags: culture, Discontent, Human Nature, Inculcation, Philosophy, Psychology, Social
The Job of Culture
February 6, 2010 in Essays, Human Nature, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
The function of culture is manyfold, but one of the most insidious of its duties is to create standard codes of conduct for man. It is these codes that allow men to effectively get along and even be productive within their society. Culture acts as the social glue that keeps large groups of men from fracturing into many smaller, bickering, and less productive units of men. By creating social standards, culture serves to make the people within its bounds seem alike. By sharing its ideals, abiding by its laws, and even adorning themselves with similar and fashionable apparel, this glue offers its members a sense of coherence, but it does so at a price. Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Apostasy, culture, Human Nature, Philosophy, Social
Gender Communication
February 3, 2010 in Bad Natured, Book Update, Essays, Human Nature, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
The extent to which men and women are able to communicate only the most simple of concepts is so pervasive that it fuels everything from talk shows to situation comedies. Countless books have been written on the subject, with the paradigm example being the famous book Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus. Seems to this author that the problem has yet to be solved. Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Apostasy, Human Nature, Social
Conspicuous Psychology
February 1, 2010 in Essays, Human Nature, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
Man is a social animal. This is no revelation. What is a surprise is that men do not understand, or at least do not think about, what this really means. There is even a whole branch of psychology whose primary directive is the study of man in this regard, but due to the constraints of the scientific method social psychology is limited to concepts based on scientific study. Some things are just not explicable by such methods, and it is my contention that this is one of them. This is not to say that social psychology is wrong, unimportant, or is otherwise without worth. The Social Animal by Elliot Aronson was one of the most compelling books that I have ever read. But what social psychology lacks is a bird’s eye view on what it means to be social.
Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Apostasy, Philosophy, Psychology, Social
But what is a Civilization?
January 28, 2010 in Essays, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
A civilization is a society that has complex, built in tools that allows for it to expand. Carroll Quigley has collectively called these tools the instrument of expansion. The instrument of expansion is a threefold device organized such that a society has an incentive to invent new ways of doing things, it is organized to produce surplus, and much of this surplus is used to fund incentives for further inventions. In essence the civilization is geared towards creating novel works that can be used to create surpluses, hence surpluses are realized, and in the spirit of creating more surpluses, profits are put towards investments such that there is an initiative to be more creative or inventive. (Quigley, 1979 (1961)). A society that develops and actualizes these tools will become expansive, and it will thus deserve the moniker of a civilization. Thus far, there have existed around two-dozen civilizations since the dawn of the sedentary, agricultural man. How many are left??? There are approximately four civilizations left in the world today, all of which currently exist in differing stages of development. These include Western, Russian, Indian, and maybe a newly forming Chinese civilization. What of the other civilizations? All of the others have passed out of existence, eaten up if you will by ravenous, burgeoning civilizations to be. This of course begs the question: Are we next to be devoured???
Tags: Civilization
Dunbar’s Number
January 26, 2010 in Essays, Social Nature by Genruk | No comments
In the early 90s, anthropologist Robin Dunbar suggested that the average number of people that the human brain could recognize is around 150. Dunbar’s number, also known as the Rule of 150, has been further found to be the average number of humans that a person can recognize in a permanent social setting, which suggests that this might be the largest number of humans that can harmoniously live together in a permanent social group. This number finds support by Matt Ridley and Paul Erlich in their respective books The Origin of Virtue and Human Natures. This socially constraining number probably results from the concept that man tends to act friendly towards those faces that he recognizes and weary if not aggressive towards those faces that are unfamiliar to him. Read the rest of this entry »
Tags: Social
Badnatured Stuff
Latest Stuff
Types of Stuff
Pronunciation
Stuff From Before
Stuff Cloud
Blogroll
- Acts of the Apostasy
- American Stranger
- Continental Philosophy
- Dead Voles
- Elusive Lucidity
- Evil Eye Reviews
- Evolutionary Psychology
- Experimental Philosophy
- Forever In Hell
- Genruk
- Grundlegung
- Human Nature Group
- Human Nature Nuggets
- Human Tea
- Idle Nature
- In the Ordinary Sense
- Indecent Bazaar
- Larval Subjects
- Moral Musings
- Neurophilosophy
- New APPS
- notebookeleven
- Overthrow
- Perverse Egalitarianism
- poltergeist
- Rethink
- Sit Down Man…
- Speculative Heresy
- Speculative Humbug
- Strange Doctrines
- the accursed share
- The Huffington Post
- The Inhumanities
- The Nameless Cynic
- Theoria
- Trauma and Philosophy
- Uncommon Descent
- Unemployed Negativity
- Union Street
- What in the hell…
- [Mass]Think!
Suggested Reading
The Social Animal by Elliot Aronson
Civilization of the Middle Ages by Normon Cantor
The Rape of Nanking by Iris Change
Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond
Beyond the Lodge of the Sun by Chokecherry Gall Eagle
The Evolution of Human Societies by A.W. Earle
Blood and Power: Organized Crime in 20th Century America by Stephen Fox
The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness by Erich Fromm
The Dark Side of Man by Michael Ghiglieri
The Culture of Make Believe by Derrick Jensen
Endgame Vol. 1 and 2 by Derrick Jensen
Me Against my Brother by Scott Peterson
The Evolution of Civilization by Carroll Quigley
Ishmael by Daniel Quinn
A History of Russia by Nicholas V. Riasanovsky
The New Penguin History of the World by J.M. Roberts
The United States Occupation of Haiti by Hans Schmidt
Roll the Bones: The History of Gambling by David G. Schwartz
Chimpanzee Politics by Frans de Waal
Good Natured by Frans de Waal

Your Say