Somewhere I read a blurb that intimated that people should turn their attention away from their favorite blogs and towards their favorite authors. While such advice seemed a genuinely positive gesture, something felt awkward. Maybe it was that I am a blogger and this notion threatened me somehow. For a day it was left at that. Then it came to me. Blogging’s insane gravity is not merely a dumbing down of the public. It is also drawing out the written creativity in those that have their own blogs. When I look out at the sea of blogs out there, what I am looking at is a sea of humanity looking to the written word to express themselves, to create, to share, and to write. In this way, the English language is getting a refresher course by way of society, and nothing could be a greater boon to the written word than to have a wave of home-based publishers daily revealing their worded wares. Merci.
Genruk
You are currently browsing articles tagged Civilization.
Almost every review of national history where diplomatic relations are examined will reveal one interesting phenomenon- the winner of the diplomatic interaction will have undoubtedly utilized a policy of diplomatic mischievousness to its fullest effect. Diplomacy is a sword fight of words, where the intents of each opponent is to pigeonhole his opposite into committing to something to the benefit of another at the expense of the committing party. This is where the agency of shenaniganry comes in. The great Bismarck may have best stated the truth of politics and diplomacy as “the capacity to choose in each fleeting moment of a situation that which is…most opportune.”
The simplest shenanigan is to pretend to commit to something, with the caveat that another will likewise make some commitment, in such a fashion that the commitment of one will not be upheld whilst the commitment by the other is held true. The common thread here is to get a country to facilitate some present day concern with the promise that the other country will oblige some commitment in the future, which of course it has no intent of doing.
The mischief of diplomacy that holds the most puissance is that which uses public opinion to sharpen the sword. The ambassador that best sniffs out public opinion to all relevant parties and then angles diplomatic combat to champion his intents by way of public opinion is the country’s hero. Ambassadors that can judge the public mood are worth there weight in embassy gold.
The real Olympians of diplomatic relations are the ones that create diplomatic crises by their mischief and then allocate the blame onto the shoulders of their diplomatic opponents. Diplomatic duplicity by way of unctuous rhetoric that dutifully inflames public support whilst concurrently instigates foreign sovereigns to commit diplomatic blunders are the work of diplomatic genius, with our man Bismarck having set the bar of creating and then profiting from diplomatic crises.
In short, ambassadors and diplomats must exhibit characteristics that man rebukes on the one hand and champions on the other- duplicity as state policy or ignominy defined, the buttery side of this bread is a side best left publicly undisclosed.
Tags: Civilization, Philosophy, Truth
Modern economics are a gargantuan complex of numbers and psychologies, national moods and dealers of clairvoyance, making any general study of economics an almost forbidden affair. In cahoots with the philosophy of Bad Natured, only economists tend to paint a veritable picture of human nature. Unfortunately that picture is hung in the back alleys of capitalism, hidden from the general public for fear that its disclosure might create a social upheaval in the bloated system of corporate politics. We here at Bad Natured are not so inclined towards reticence and discretion.
As abstruse as our economic infrastructure has come to be, there is one simple aspect that deserves cool deliberation. Our economic system is unwaveringly dependent upon unlimited growth. In other words, were our current system to stabilize itself in a zero-growth fashion, it would falter. OR, when the resources that our economic system demands be infinite instead reveal their finite nature, economic collapse will result. By account of our current system, it is as if man has based our economic system on the utilization of the resources of the entire universe but in fact is limited to those remaining resources that our planet has to offer. Unless we succumb to fairy tale logic, when the ignored limitations of the Earth’s resources come front and center as a real-time phenomenon, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.
Now we at Bad Natured are all for branching out into the universe, looking for planets chock full of iron and water and maybe even energy, but man had better get his ducks all in order and foment such a search instead of persisting in the bitter and mindless squabble over the dwindling Earth-bound resources at hand. Better yet, maybe another planet will occasion an atmosphere conducive to human colonization. With all of our current technology seemingly directed towards enhancing our silly need for hand held devices of music, connectivity, and personal branding, maybe we should invest in a sidereal campaign and concentrate our efforts towards fomenting such an atmosphere on some presently uninhabitable planet. Unless man can suddenly champion an economic system not based on a fantastical notion of infinite creation of products to satisfy an equally infinite demand for consumption, a materialism driven by the discontent found in a self-aware creature that has traded in his sense of community for a finite moment of greed contented, man had better light a match under the butts of NASA’s ace scientists such that we will have a home to export our Juggernauts of posterity, the ceaseless consumers of the morrow.
Genruk
Tags: Civilization, Discontent, economics, Philosophy, Truth
In all ecological systems, Darwin’s notion that the strongest will rightfully eek out the weakest has been utilized to defined capitalism. In this sense, economic Darwinism is used as the justifiable backbone for our economy. The problem is that we are using antiquated notions of Darwinism instead of a less convenient look at ecological and economic systems. The new Darwinism should not look at the system in terms of the strength of individuals but instead on the strength of the system as a whole. The old system champions outdated theories, and as such the unbalanced dominance of humans on the planet is viewed in glowing terms, our pride blinding us to reality. Let us look at the world through the lens of the new Darwinism. This new dogma states that strong ecologic systems will be propagated and weak systems, and more importantly unbalanced systems, will be self-eliminating and thereby replaced.
An honest look at life on Earth will undoubtedly reveal some disturbing realities of existence. In ecologic terms, man is akin to some new species that has overtaken its environment through its limitless appetite. When a species acts as such, and the system becomes unbalanced, an ecologic crisis will ensue until the system again rights itself such that it can again become balanced and thereby strong. For example, if the overwhelming species strips clean its environment, it will undoubtedly experience a massive famine, with extinction a possibility. Might the same thing occur in economic terms? Looking at the system in terms of the hierarchy of man as opposed to the hierarchy of species, might those on the top of the economic ladder be creating an unbalanced economic system that will inevitably weaken the system to the point of economic disaster? Taking this further, might the disparity of both systems be linked, with man at the helm of ecologic and economic instability, which cannot but lead to a cataclysmic crisis and fatal denouement of humanity?
Is living the dream of Western Civilization’s fantasy worth risking the elimination our species? Are we even capable of change, or is our species on a screaming one-way journey? Stay tuned, or better yet jump off the train of civilization for a moment and take a look around sans the convenience of cultural inculcation blurring the view.
Genruk’
Tags: Apostasy, Civilization, culture, Human Nature, Inculcation, Perception, Philosophy, Truth

Your Say