Social

You are currently browsing articles tagged Social.

Man’s self-aware nature lends itself perfectly to the lure of this insidious vice[gambling].  The notion of self-awareness is tied directly with gambling in that we can literally imagine ourselves winning and it takes a sense of self to picture such things.  As well, all of man wishes himself to be extraordinary, and gambling is the perfect diagonal upon which to attempt to establish such a fancy.  As egocentric creatures, we thereby might take to gambling as a way to not only prove to ourselves and to others the presence of our reverent value, but to also profit from the venture in the process.  Even in movies the good guys are portrayed as if repeatedly blessed with luck, as if they harbor that something special that we all wish to engender which allots them, and hopefully us, the good fortune to win against the weighted odds of the house. Through intelligence and self-awareness, gambling might have been born of the want to prove a guy in better touch with the spiritual side of existence, further establishing one’s worth and value in the eyes of significant members of his community as well as the self.  To be lucky is to be blessed.  This compulsion to gamble ultimately emerges from the fundamental social nature of man.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , ,

I have noticed a rather unusual disparity between local newscasts and national ones.  While the local news is more likely to present stories both good and bad, the national outlets seem to concentrate mostly on the negative things that men do.  My question is, can such a disparity support the overall contention of human nature, where men are more likely to cooperate with familiar faces whilst being wary and uncooperative with the nefarious stranger?

Of course it does.  While truly local news agencies, which serves a smaller base of viewers, might be more inclined to relate news that is positive, larger news outlets, due to a fan base made up of strangers, tends to concentrate on news items that are negative.  This is because a group of strangers, those tuning in to the national news, is more inclined to want to hear negative things regarding strange peoples and are not really concerned with any positive news of the distant stranger.  When that same individual turns into his local newscast, he is more than please to see how the scores of the local high school football games, or maybe even a story that exemplifies the goodness of those within his community.  This is just further proof that we live unnatural and unfruitful lives by attempting to extend cooperation to people that exist outside of our local community.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

Is there some compelling force with draws us in to keep up with our neighbors?  Is it all about pride and ego, or might there be a force of human nature that is in part responsible for such a laughable race to have the best lawn on the block?  There is in fact one facet of man’s social nature which can fuel such a phenomenon.

Man’s social nature makes him want to belong, to fit in, and to have social worth within his immediate community.  As such, one behavior which can serve as a direct manner to express his social worth is by showing both his similitude and worth by not only having a boat in his driveway, but by having the most expensive boat possible.  The boat becomes a symbol  that he not only belongs to his community of nautical neighbors, but is also a status symbol of his relative worth in his community.  If the social nature of man is exemplified by the desire to be seen in the best possible light, such a symbol becomes a badge that confers both membership and status within the neighbor’s community.

Of course, there is more than a little pride involved here, but that meticulous lawn, Lexus SUV, and sea-worthy status symbol in the driveway can be just the ticket for an invitation to the next neighborhood BBQ, where the neighborhood clan can all revel in their latest exploits.  Keeping up with the Jones might be a straight forward expression of man’s social nature after all.

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

The overall contention of Bad Natured is that men are by nature suspicious if not aggressive to unfamiliar men.  In fact, men are by nature xenophobic and this notion has been demonstrated throughout the history of mankind.  Only fairy tale logic will prove otherwise.  But men are intelligent as well as opportunistic, and as such the benefits that abound from alliance formation between groups have allowed the ever wary stranger to benefit from occasionally befriending the stranger.  Does such a notion not negate the overall contention of Bad Natured, that strangers must always remain antagonistic?

At first the notion of alliance formation between potentially competing groups would seem nigh impossible if men are to be viewed as truly xenophobic, but there exists a truly magnificent facet of man that can trick his very nature into allowing such an impossibility to in fact exist.  The cohesive forces of family relations are used here as a social glue which can be extended to strangers to make them seem less strange, more trustworthy, and hence less spooky.  Such a trick is employed by use of the creation myth that dictates that all of the peoples involved have actually arisen from a common ancestor.  Such a myth takes the members of the opposing groups and ties them together through contrived familial relations.  Instead of strangers, they are long lost members of the family, and as such the psychological distance created by man’s inherent xenophobia are circumvented, allowing for strangers to embrace their mythologic kin.  Even in America, boiling pot of multitudes of differing races, we have the distant notion of the common ancestor tied to our ever divine founding fathers.  Of course, such a tactic has its limitations, which have been more than exceeded in this overly populated world of ours, but this notion can at least be seen to be the basis for the hierarchies and alliances that have come to define the ever complicated world of the modern man.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

Man is at continual odds with his culture, his sense of self, and his innate systems of behaviors.  Culture’s function is in part to create standard codes of conduct which creates a social matrix within which he is to function with other humans.  Without this matrix, men could not exist within such highly populated societies without engaging in ceaseless violence.  His innate inclinations towards violence would constantly pull him into violent altercations with other strange men, for that is his nature.  Culture therefore allows for societies to exist in magnitudes that could not occur without policing forces of man’s natural and aggressive behaviors.

Now if men were not so darned self-aware, inclined to introspection, philosophy, and spirituality, to name but a few attributes, his lot would do just fine, for he would not care that his culture and his natural inclinations were at odds with one another.  But this is not the case, and instead man is tormented with an inner and an outer sense of self, which becomes combine into essentially a neurotic individual.  Man feels some behaviors as naked as the day he was born, but is compelled to believe that these feelings are unnatural and evil.  His social nature takes this a step further.  Because he wants to be seen in the best light, and because his cohorts all pretend to believe in their inculturations, or rather inculcations, he too pretends to believe that which his society propagates as the correct way to be.  Deep down, though, man still feels otherwise, and feels the guilt, cognitive dissonance, and discontent from being at such odds with himself.

Ah, the perpetual plight of man, to never be at ease, pulled in one moment by his natural inclinations, the next minute by his desire to be seen in the most favorable light by those significant to him, only then to be drawn into the facade of how a man should be according to culture, to lastly being sucked into some shenanigan through the power of peer pressure, leaving behind a shell of man whose only repose is chemical relief through endogenous or exogenous addictions such as booze or  gambling.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Examining conspicuous psychology and the social nature of man, let us briefly examine the facade that is the persona.  Persona can be  literally defined as a mask, and i could not agree more.  Personas are literally the social roles that we play depending on the individuals that are in our immediate environment.  For example, if we are visiting our grandparents, we will likely behave in a rather angelic manner.  When we are hanging out with our hunting buddies, rough and tumble drinking and joke-telling is more in line with our character.  On a date with a hot new girl in town, chivalry and a little self-promotion are in order.  Why do we act in such ways, which in our limited survey would create three separate personalities for our soon to be psychiatric patient seeking drugs for a multiple personality disorder?  Why would the individual instead just express his personality in the same fashion in every situation?

The answer is simple, because we care what people think of us such that we behave in different situations in order to be seen in a favorable light–because we are driven by our conspicuous psychology.  As such, we probably are only ourselves when we are alone, but since we are alone, those same behaviors will be limited because we have no need to express any behavior due to the conspicuous lack of an audience.  This of course begs the question, who are we really???

Genruk

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

In social species where temperament and intelligence determine one’s rank, when members are given artificially elevated and undeserving ranks, then chaos reigns until the natural order is restored.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

One of the most prominent, and misunderstood if not disguised, aspects of man is his hierarchical nature.  Western Civilization has convinced itself that all of man should be equal in status such that it has inculcated its members with the specious contention that this is the true nature of man.  Nothing could be further from the truth, but to state such a thing is an apostasy so immense that one might as well defecate on the Thanksgiving dinner table.  Please excuse such a crass thought, but to think that man is truly an egalitarian creature due to the mind soothing effects of such a convenient notion does man more than a disservice, for its results are deleterious if not catastrophic.  There is no getting around the true nature of man, no matter how much he wishes it to be otherwise.

Let us delve further into this issus with an examination of one man’s most noticeable traits, his competitive nature.  There is no denying such a contention, but when we go to the next level and contend that man is dominant by nature the notions gets skewed.  But even this possibility, that man is dominant by nature cannot be denied.  But in taking the next step in this logical sequence in an attempt to come to terms with the hierarchical nature of man, the human creature somehow sidesteps this notion and instead wishes that all of man to be equal in status, at least in the very core of man.  Herein lies the problem, because by definition, the trait of dominance creates hierarchies in social creatures, and only fallacious logic can prove otherwise.  That man should all be treated as equals can never work because it is in man’s very core to be otherwise.  Any and all efforts to contain man’s nature has and will forever fail, leading to discontent at the least and devastation at the worst.  It is nigh time to come to terms with the true nature of man such that intelligence and not convenience becomes the basis for policies that are honestly designed to allow man to behave within a society.  Any other efforts will come to be the seeds of evil, evil which is born of repression of natural inclinations and which comes to fruition when these repressed feelings come to be expressed in perverted manifestations of these repressed inclinations.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

As I draw closer to finishing up the the chapter on inculcation, it must be admitted that a little trepidation is sneaking in to haunt me as the book proper is coming close to its finish.  This last core chapter, which is to be followed up with a summary chapter, has been the most difficult chapter to date.  Thankfully, it is turning out better than could be imagined.  This chapter includes a comprehensive definition of inculcation as well as the basic founts of cultural inculcation, which of course are the church, the news and the general media, the law, the education system, governmental propaganda, and the unstoppable forces of communication in general.  The leveraging forces of inculcation are addressed as well, including legislation, police and the armed forces, as well as the social instincts which serve to control unacceptable behaviors within a community.  The use of propaganda and calumny by the government are examined as well, and I have included many historical events where inculcation has been used with drastic effect, such as the Nanking Massacre and the Rwandan Machete Atrocity.  My favorite portion of the chapter, though, is found in the contemplations of the  Catholic Church’s cohesive forces of inculcation and how they gave rise to the civilization laconically known as The West.   The implications of Christian influence in the Occident, and that this influence may be currently waning, is a portentous consideration concerning the future of The West.  How will The West fare in the not to distant future?  Will it fare at all?  From whence will the next phoenix rise?  Hopefully subjects such as these and more will be spurred in the reader through the provocations of Bad Natured.

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , ,

     The function of culture is manyfold, but one of the most insidious of its duties is to create standard codes of conduct for man.  It is these codes that allow men to effectively get along and even be productive within their society.  Culture acts as the social glue that keeps large groups of men from fracturing into many smaller, bickering, and less productive units of men.  By creating social standards, culture serves to make the people within its bounds seem alike.  By sharing its ideals, abiding by its laws, and even adorning themselves with similar and fashionable apparel, this glue offers its members a sense of coherence, but it does so at a price. Read the rest of this entry »

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
Share

Tags: , , , ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »